Gautam et al., 2004: Organizational Identification and Organizational Commitment: Distinct Aspects of Two Related Concepts

This publication is cited by the following publications:

Citation:

Thaneswor Gautam, Rolf Van Dick, and Ulrich Wagner. Organizational identification and organizational commitment: Distinct aspects of two related concepts. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(3):301–315, December 2004. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839X.2004.00150.x.

Bibtex


@article{gautam_organizational_2004,
 abstract = {The conceptual differences between organizational commitment and identification are discussed theoretically and examined empirically. The present study is based on data of 450 employees of five different organizations in Nepal. A revised eight-item scale was designed out of Cheney's Organizational Identification Questionnaire to assess the core aspects of organizational identification. In confirmatory factor analyses, identification was found to be distinguishable from four related commitment concepts (i.e. affective, continuance, normative, and attitudinal commitment).},
 author = {Gautam, Thaneswor and Van Dick, Rolf and Wagner, Ulrich},
 doi = {10.1111/j.1467-839X.2004.00150.x},
 issn = {1467-839X},
 journal = {Asian Journal of Social Psychology},
 language = {en},
 month = {December},
 number = {3},
 pages = {301-315},
 shorttitle = {Organizational Identification and Organizational Commitment},
 title = {Organizational Identification and Organizational Commitment: {{Distinct}} Aspects of Two Related Concepts},
 volume = {7},
 year = {2004}
}