A theoretical model in which the effects of neutralization techniques are tested alongside those of sanctions described by deterrence theory. Our empirical results highlight neutralization as an important factor to take into account with regard to developing and implementing organizational security policies and practices.
Construct | Cites | Category | Questions given? | Content validity | Pretests | Response type | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intention | Paternoster, 1996 | yes | 15 experts panel with three rounds of review | pretest | 11 point scale | ||
Denial of responsibility | Thurman, 1984 | Neutralization | yes | 16 experts panel with three rounds of review | pretest | 11 point scale | 2/3 items new |
Denial of injury | Thurman, 1984 | Neutralization | yes | 17 experts panel with three rounds of review | pretest | 11 point scale | 2/3 items new |
Condemnation of the condemners | Thurman, 1984 | Neutralization | yes | 18 experts panel with three rounds of review | pretest | 11 point scale | 2/3 items new |
Defense of necessity | Thurman, 1984 | Neutralization | yes | 19 experts panel with three rounds of review | pretest | 11 point scale | 2/3 items new |
Metaphor of the ledger | Eliason, 1999 | Neutralization | yes | 20 experts panel with three rounds of review | pretest | 11 point scale | New item based on |
Appeal to higher loyalties | Thurman, 1984 | Neutralization | yes | 21 experts panel with three rounds of review | pretest | 11 point scale | |
Certainty | Nagin, 1993, Paternoster, 1996 | Formal Sanctions | yes | 22 experts panel with three rounds of review | pretest | 11 point scale | |
Severity | Nagin, 1993, Paternoster, 1996 | Formal Sanctions | yes | 23 experts panel with three rounds of review | pretest | 11 point scale | |
Certainty | Nagin, 1993, Paternoster, 1996 | Informal Sanctions | yes | 24 experts panel with three rounds of review | pretest | 11 point scale | |
Severity | Nagin, 1993, Paternoster, 1996 | Informal Sanctions | yes | 25 experts panel with three rounds of review | pretest | 11 point scale | |
Certainty of shame for oneself | Nagin, 1993, Paternoster, 1996 | yes | 26 experts panel with three rounds of review | pretest | 11 point scale | ||
Severity of shame for oneself | Nagin, 1993, Paternoster, 1996 | yes | 27 experts panel with three rounds of review | pretest | 11 point scale |
Mikko Siponen and Anthony Vance. Neutralization: New insights into the problem of employee information systems security policy violations. MIS quarterly, 34(3):487, 2010. doi:10.2307/25750688.
@article{siponen_neutralization_2010,
abstract = {Employees' failure to comply with information systems security policies is a major concern for information technology security managers. In efforts to understand this problem, IS security researchers have traditionally viewed violations of IS security policies through the lens of deterrence theory. In this article, we show that neutralization theory, a theory prominent in Criminology but not yet applied in the context of IS, provides a compelling explanation for IS security policy violations and offers new insight into how employees rationalize this behavior. In doing so, we propose a theoretical model in which the effects of neutralization techniques are tested alongside those of sanctions described by deterrence theory. Our empirical results highlight neutralization as an important factor to take into account with regard to developing and implementing organizational security policies and practices.},
author = {Siponen, Mikko and Vance, Anthony},
doi = {10.2307/25750688},
journal = {MIS quarterly},
keywords = {Compliance,Deterrence theory,IS security,IS security policies,Neutralization theory},
number = {3},
pages = {487},
title = {Neutralization: {{New}} Insights into the Problem of Employee Information Systems Security Policy Violations},
volume = {34},
year = {2010}
}