Social bonds that are formed at work largely influence attitudes towards compliance and subjective norms, with both constructs positively affecting employees’ ISSP compliance.
| Construct | Cites | Category | Questions given? | Content validity | Pretests | Response type | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attachment | Lee et al., 2004 | Social bond | yes | expert review | none | 7-point Likert scale ranging from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree | |
| Commitment | Lee et al., 2004, Herath, 2009 | Social bond | yes | expert review | none | 7-point Likert scale ranging from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree | |
| Involvement | Lee et al., 2004 | Social bond | yes | expert review | none | 7-point Likert scale ranging from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree | |
| Personal norms | Li et al., 2010 | Social bond | yes | expert review | none | 7-point Likert scale ranging from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree | |
| Attitude toward ISSP compliance | Woon, 2007, Bulgurcu et al., 2010, Herath, 2009, Herath, 2009 | yes | expert review | none | 7-point Likert scale ranging from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree | ||
| Subjective norms | Bulgurcu et al., 2010 | yes | expert review | none | 7-point Likert scale ranging from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree | ||
| Locus of control | Workman et al., 2008 | Social control | yes | expert review | none | 7-point Likert scale ranging from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree | |
| Self-efficacy | Woon, 2007, Workman et al., 2008, Compeau, 1995 | Social control | yes | expert review | none | 7-point Likert scale ranging from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree | |
| ISSP compliance behavioral intentions | Woon, 2007, Herath, 2009, Herath, 2009 | yes | expert review | none | 7-point Likert scale ranging from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree | ||
| Detection probability | Herath, 2009, Herath, 2009 | yes | expert review | none | 7-point Likert scale ranging from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree | ||
| Sanction severity | Herath, 2009, Herath, 2009 | yes | expert review | none | 7-point Likert scale ranging from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree |
Princely Ifinedo. Information systems security policy compliance: An empirical study of the effects of socialisation, influence, and cognition. Information & Management, 51(1):69–79, January 2014. doi:10.1016/j.im.2013.10.001.
@article{ifinedo_information_2014,
abstract = {This study investigated employees' information systems security policy (ISSP) compliance behavioural intentions in organisations from the theoretical lenses of social bonding, social influence, and cognitive processing. Given that previous research on ISSP compliance has been based on deterrence theory, this study seeks to augment and diversify research on ISSP compliance through its theoretical perspective. Relevant hypotheses were developed to test the research conceptualisation. Data from a survey of business managers and IS professionals confirmed that social bonds that are formed at work largely influence attitudes towards compliance and subjective norms, with both constructs positively affecting employees' ISSP compliance. Employees' locus of control and capabilities and competence related to IS security issues also affect ISSP compliance behavioural intentions. Overall, the constructs in the research model enhance our understanding of the social-organisational and psychological factors that might encourage or accentuate employees' ISSP compliance in the workplace.},
author = {Ifinedo, Princely},
doi = {10.1016/j.im.2013.10.001},
issn = {0378-7206},
journal = {Information \& Management},
keywords = {cognition,Compliance,Information systems security policy,Behavioural intentions,Socialisation,Social influence},
month = {January},
number = {1},
pages = {69-79},
shorttitle = {Information Systems Security Policy Compliance},
title = {Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: {{An}} Empirical Study of the Effects of Socialisation, Influence, and Cognition},
volume = {51},
year = {2014}
}