Construct: Self-efficacy

Also quoted in literature as:

• Self-Efficacy

This construct belongs to the following categories:

• Social control
• Fear appeals
• self-efficacy

This construct is used by:

• Ifinedo, 2014: Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of the Effects of Socialisation, Influence, and Cognition
  Questions given: yes
• Herath, 2009: Protection Motivation and Deterrence: A Framework for Security Policy Compliance in Organisations
  Questions given: yes
• Workman et al., 2008: Security Lapses and the Omission of Information Security Measures: A Threat Control Model and Empirical Test
  Questions given: yes
• Woon, 2007: Investigation of IS Professionals' Intention to Practise Secure Development of Applications
  Questions given: yes
• Tamjidyamcholo et al., 2013: Information Security \textendash Professional Perceptions of Knowledge-Sharing Intention under Self-Efficacy, Trust, Reciprocity, and Shared-Language
  Questions given: yes
• Kuo, 2008: A Study of the Intention\textendashAction Gap in Knowledge Sharing Practices
  Questions given: yes
• Siponen et al., 2014: Employees' Adherence to Information Security Policies: An Exploratory Field Study
  Questions given: yes, in English
• Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
  Questions given: example
• Tu et al., 2015: Learning to Cope with Information Security Risks Regarding Mobile Device Loss or Theft: An Empirical Examination
  Questions given: yes
• Ifinedo, 2012: Understanding Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Integration of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Protection Motivation Theory
  Questions given: yes
• Karlsson et al., 2017: Measuring Employees' Compliance \textendash the Importance of Value Pluralism
  Questions given: yes

Papers using this construct cite the following papers for the source of this construct:

• Woon, 2007: Investigation of IS Professionals' Intention to Practise Secure Development of Applications
• Workman et al., 2008: Security Lapses and the Omission of Information Security Measures: A Threat Control Model and Empirical Test
• Compeau, 1995: Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test
• Taylor, 1995: Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models
• Rotter, 1966: Generalized Expectancies for Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcement
• Harrington, 1996: The Effect of Codes of Ethics and Personal Denial of Responsibility on Computer Abuse Judgments and Intentions
• Bhattacherjee, 2000: Acceptance of E-Commerce Services: The Case of Electronic Brokerages
• Pedersen, 2001: Adoption of Mobile Commerce: An Exploratory Analysis
• Fang, 2010: In Justice We Trust: Exploring Knowledge-Sharing Continuance Intentions in Virtual Communities of Practice
• Hsu et al., 2007: Knowledge Sharing Behavior in Virtual Communities: The Relationship between Trust, Self-Efficacy, and Outcome Expectations
• Bandura, 1995: Guide for Constructing Self-Efficacy Scales
• Herath, 2009: Protection Motivation and Deterrence: A Framework for Security Policy Compliance in Organisations
• Bulgurcu et al., 2010: Information Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of Rationality-Based Beliefs and Information Security Awareness
• Siponen et al., 2010: Compliance with Information Security Policies: An Empirical Investigation
• Ifinedo, 2012: Understanding Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Integration of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Protection Motivation Theory
• Son, 2011: Out of Fear or Desire? Toward a Better Understanding of Employees' Motivation to Follow IS Security Policies
• Chan et al., 2005: Perceptions of Information Security in the Workplace: Linking Information Security Climate to Compliant Behavior
• Lee, 2009: Threat or Coping Appraisal: Determinants of SMB Executives' Decision to Adopt Anti-Malware Software

The following constructs were (potentially) derived from this construct:

• Information security knowledge sharing by Sohrabi Safa et al., 2016: Information Security Policy Compliance Model in Organizations
• Information security collaboration by Sohrabi Safa et al., 2016: Information Security Policy Compliance Model in Organizations
• Information security intervention by Sohrabi Safa et al., 2016: Information Security Policy Compliance Model in Organizations
• Information security experience by Sohrabi Safa et al., 2016: Information Security Policy Compliance Model in Organizations
• Attachment by Sohrabi Safa et al., 2016: Information Security Policy Compliance Model in Organizations
• Commitment by Sohrabi Safa et al., 2016: Information Security Policy Compliance Model in Organizations
• Personal norms by Sohrabi Safa et al., 2016: Information Security Policy Compliance Model in Organizations
• Attitude towards compliance with ISOP by Sohrabi Safa et al., 2016: Information Security Policy Compliance Model in Organizations
• ISOP compliance behavioural intentions by Sohrabi Safa et al., 2016: Information Security Policy Compliance Model in Organizations
• Commitment by Ifinedo, 2014: Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of the Effects of Socialisation, Influence, and Cognition
• Attitude toward ISSP compliance by Ifinedo, 2014: Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of the Effects of Socialisation, Influence, and Cognition
• Attitude toward ISSP compliance by Ifinedo, 2014: Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of the Effects of Socialisation, Influence, and Cognition
• Locus of control by Ifinedo, 2014: Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of the Effects of Socialisation, Influence, and Cognition
• Self-efficacy by Ifinedo, 2014: Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of the Effects of Socialisation, Influence, and Cognition
• Self-efficacy by Ifinedo, 2014: Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of the Effects of Socialisation, Influence, and Cognition
• ISSP compliance behavioral intentions by Ifinedo, 2014: Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of the Effects of Socialisation, Influence, and Cognition
• ISSP compliance behavioral intentions by Ifinedo, 2014: Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of the Effects of Socialisation, Influence, and Cognition
• Detection probability by Ifinedo, 2014: Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of the Effects of Socialisation, Influence, and Cognition
• Sanction severity by Ifinedo, 2014: Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of the Effects of Socialisation, Influence, and Cognition
• Information security risk reduction expectation by Tamjidyamcholo et al., 2014: Evaluation Model for Knowledge Sharing in Information Security Professional Virtual Community
• Knowledge self-efficacy by Witherspoon et al., 2013: Antecedents of Organizational Knowledge Sharing: A Meta-Analysis and Critique
• Subjective norm by Witherspoon et al., 2013: Antecedents of Organizational Knowledge Sharing: A Meta-Analysis and Critique
• Subjective norm by Witherspoon et al., 2013: Antecedents of Organizational Knowledge Sharing: A Meta-Analysis and Critique
• Intention to Comply by Al-Omari et al., 2013: Information Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of Ethical Ideology
• Self-Efficacy by Al-Omari et al., 2013: Information Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of Ethical Ideology
• Subjective Norm by Al-Omari et al., 2013: Information Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of Ethical Ideology
• Moral Obligation by Al-Omari et al., 2013: Information Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of Ethical Ideology
• Utilitarianism by Al-Omari et al., 2013: Information Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of Ethical Ideology
• Formalism by Al-Omari et al., 2013: Information Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of Ethical Ideology
• Ethical Egoism by Al-Omari et al., 2013: Information Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of Ethical Ideology
• Attitude by Al-Omari et al., 2013: Information Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of Ethical Ideology
• Attitude towards compliance by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Attitude towards compliance by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Descriptive norm by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Intention to comply by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Intention to comply by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Intention to comply by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Normative beliefs by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Normative beliefs by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Organizational commitment by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Perceived severity of incident by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Perceived severity of sanctions by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Perceived Certainty of Sanctions by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Perceived vulnerability by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Response cost by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Response cost by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Response efficacy by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Response efficacy by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Self-efficacy by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Self-efficacy by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Self-efficacy by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Threat appraisal by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Self-efficacy by Tu et al., 2015: Learning to Cope with Information Security Risks Regarding Mobile Device Loss or Theft: An Empirical Examination
• Response efficacy by Tu et al., 2015: Learning to Cope with Information Security Risks Regarding Mobile Device Loss or Theft: An Empirical Examination
• Perceived threat by Tu et al., 2015: Learning to Cope with Information Security Risks Regarding Mobile Device Loss or Theft: An Empirical Examination
• Information Security Policy Provision by Haeussinger, 2013: Information Security Awareness: Its Antecedents and Mediating Effects on Security Compliant Behavior
• Perceived severity by Ifinedo, 2012: Understanding Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Integration of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Protection Motivation Theory
• Perceived vulnerability by Ifinedo, 2012: Understanding Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Integration of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Protection Motivation Theory
• Response cost by Ifinedo, 2012: Understanding Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Integration of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Protection Motivation Theory
• Response efficacy by Ifinedo, 2012: Understanding Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Integration of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Protection Motivation Theory
• Attitude toward ISSP compliance by Ifinedo, 2012: Understanding Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Integration of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Protection Motivation Theory
• Attitude toward ISSP compliance by Ifinedo, 2012: Understanding Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Integration of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Protection Motivation Theory
• Subjective norms by Ifinedo, 2012: Understanding Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Integration of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Protection Motivation Theory
• Subjective norms by Ifinedo, 2012: Understanding Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Integration of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Protection Motivation Theory
• Self-efficacy by Ifinedo, 2012: Understanding Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Integration of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Protection Motivation Theory
• Self-efficacy by Ifinedo, 2012: Understanding Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Integration of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Protection Motivation Theory
• ISSP compliance behavioral intentions by Ifinedo, 2012: Understanding Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Integration of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Protection Motivation Theory
• ISSP compliance behavioral intentions by Ifinedo, 2012: Understanding Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Integration of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Protection Motivation Theory

---