Construct: Attitude towards compliance

Also quoted in literature as:

• attitude
• personal norms
• attitude towards issp compliance
• Attitude towards compliance with ISOP
• Attitude toward ISSP compliance
• attitude towards information security policy and procedures

This construct belongs to the following categories:

• Compliance
• theory of planned behavior
• Social bond
• HAIS-Q

This construct is used by:

• Sohrabi Safa et al., 2016: Information Security Policy Compliance Model in Organizations
  Questions given: yes
• Ifinedo, 2014: Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of the Effects of Socialisation, Influence, and Cognition
  Questions given: yes
• Parsons et al., 2015: The Influence of Organizational Information Security Culture on Information Security Decision Making
  Questions given: no
• Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
  Questions given: example
• Ifinedo, 2012: Understanding Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Integration of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Protection Motivation Theory
  Questions given: yes
• Johnston, 2010: The Influence of Perceived Source Credibility on End User Attitudes and Intentions to Comply with Recommended It Actions
  Questions given: yes

Papers using this construct cite the following papers for the source of this construct:

• Cheng et al., 2013: Understanding the Violation of IS Security Policy in Organizations: An Integrated Model Based on Social Control and Deterrence Theory
• Ifinedo, 2014: Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of the Effects of Socialisation, Influence, and Cognition
• Tamjidyamcholo et al., 2014: Evaluation Model for Knowledge Sharing in Information Security Professional Virtual Community
• Witherspoon et al., 2013: Antecedents of Organizational Knowledge Sharing: A Meta-Analysis and Critique
• Woon, 2007: Investigation of IS Professionals' Intention to Practise Secure Development of Applications
• Bulgurcu et al., 2010: Information Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of Rationality-Based Beliefs and Information Security Awareness
• Herath, 2009: Encouraging Information Security Behaviors in Organizations: Role of Penalties, Pressures and Perceived Effectiveness
• Herath, 2009: Protection Motivation and Deterrence: A Framework for Security Policy Compliance in Organisations
• Parsons et al., 2014: Determining Employee Awareness Using the Human Aspects of Information Security Questionnaire (HAIS-Q)
• Li et al., 2010: Understanding Compliance with Internet Use Policy from the Perspective of Rational Choice Theory
• Pahnila et al., 2007: Employees' Behavior towards IS Security Policy Compliance
• Ifinedo, 2012: Understanding Information Systems Security Policy Compliance: An Integration of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Protection Motivation Theory
• Zhang et al., 2009: Impact of Perceived Technical Protection on Security Behaviors
• Bulgurcu et al., 2009: Effects of Individual and Organization Based Beliefs and the Moderating Role of Work Experience on Insiders' Good Security Behaviors
• Siponen et al., 2010: Compliance with Information Security Policies: An Empirical Investigation
• Venkatesh et al., 2003: User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View

The following constructs were (potentially) derived from this construct:

• Information security knowledge sharing by Sohrabi Safa et al., 2016: Information Security Policy Compliance Model in Organizations
• Information security collaboration by Sohrabi Safa et al., 2016: Information Security Policy Compliance Model in Organizations
• Information security intervention by Sohrabi Safa et al., 2016: Information Security Policy Compliance Model in Organizations
• Information security experience by Sohrabi Safa et al., 2016: Information Security Policy Compliance Model in Organizations
• Attachment by Sohrabi Safa et al., 2016: Information Security Policy Compliance Model in Organizations
• Commitment by Sohrabi Safa et al., 2016: Information Security Policy Compliance Model in Organizations
• Personal norms by Sohrabi Safa et al., 2016: Information Security Policy Compliance Model in Organizations
• ISOP compliance behavioural intentions by Sohrabi Safa et al., 2016: Information Security Policy Compliance Model in Organizations
• Attitude towards compliance by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Intention to comply by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Intention to comply by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Normative beliefs by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Perceived severity of incident by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Perceived vulnerability by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Response cost by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Response efficacy by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
• Self-efficacy by Sommestad et al., 2014: Variables Influencing Information Security Policy Compliance: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies

---