Trust is a poor explanatory of knowledge sharing. Team membership, on the other hand, has the largest effect on the density of knowledge sharing relationships. Social capital thus does not reside in trust but in team membership, especially for longer-lived teams.
Construct | Cites | Category | Questions given? | Content validity | Pretests | Response type | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge sharing | NEW | yes | no | none | binary matrix of sharing intentions with other team members | ||
Trust | Mayer et al., 1995 | yes | no | none | 7-point likert scale |
Marloes Bakker, Roger Th.A.J. Leenders, Shaul M. Gabbay, Jan Kratzer, and Jo M.L. Van Engelen. Is trust really social capital? Knowledge sharing in product development projects. The Learning Organization, 13(6):594–605, November 2006. doi:10.1108/09696470610705479.
@article{bakker_trust_2006,
author = {Bakker, Marloes and Leenders, Roger Th.A.J. and Gabbay, Shaul M. and Kratzer, Jan and Van Engelen, Jo M.L.},
doi = {10.1108/09696470610705479},
editor = {Smith, Peter A.C.},
issn = {0969-6474},
journal = {The Learning Organization},
language = {en},
month = {November},
number = {6},
pages = {594-605},
shorttitle = {Is Trust Really Social Capital?},
title = {Is Trust Really Social Capital? {{Knowledge}} Sharing in Product Development Projects},
volume = {13},
year = {2006}
}